Thermage-RF Treatments
Breakthrough or Broken Promises?
Paul Van Camp MD
The promise of RF is a face-lift without surgery. Tightening
the skin and lifting sagging areas such as the forehead,
eyelids and cheeks in a painless, safe and inexpensive procedure
with no down-time. It sounds too good to be true, doesnt
it?
Yet that is exactly what the early reports on RF treatments
suggested when they came out over the last year. The Thermage
RF treatments (also called ThermaCool TC) have been basking
in the limelight of national press coverage including a recent
segment on the Oprah Show, and other popular programs. Now
the phones at Aesthetics MD are ringing with
inquiries about RF treatments and especially about the Thermage
device.
What is RF?
RF stands for Radio-Frequency energy. It is not a laser
and not a light-based device. Rather it is a form of electro-magnetic
energy very similar to microwaves. The RF treatment passes
radio frequency electricity through the skin to heat up the
tissues. This is supposed to make the tissue contract and
induce a response to cause tightening of the skin and to
improve wrinkles. The Thermage RF system uses only this radio
frequency energy. Another company (Syneron) makes a device
called the Aurora using intense pulsed light and adding RF
energy to it for a combination treatment.
Despite the early claims made when the devices came out,
two important questions remain to be answered: Does RF work?
And is it safe? Research has now been published which gives
us some answers to these questions.
Safety
Initial reports presented by physicians who were testing
the RF machines came out last April at the largest annual
laser conference. They suggested that there were neither
complications nor adverse effects seen with the treatments.
However, this just didnt make sense. When you heat
the skin with microwave-like RF treatments you would expect
some risk of burning the skin. No medical treatment is completely
risk free. Therefore, I chose to wait for better data before
considering RF treatments. That data has now been published.
(Reference is at end of this article.)
The original investigators testing the Thermage RF system
published their results on 86 patients. (This includes the
physician who appeared on Oprah.) They followed the patients
for six months after the RF treatments. Indeed there were
serious complications: 17% of their patients experienced
second-degree burns from the treatment. Many of these burns
were considered "deep" second-degree burns. This
resulted in 3.4% of the patients being scarred on their faces
because of the RF treatments. This is a completely unacceptable
degree of risk for an elective cosmetic procedure.
Moreover, what about comfort: do the treatments hurt? Physicians
previously had stated that the treatments were "nearly
pain free" for most patients. However, in the published
study the authors admitted that there was some problem with
pain during the treatments. In fact, these RF treatments
tend to be very painful. Many patients required intravenous
pain medicines to get through the treatment. It can feel
like someone is burning your face which in a way,
they are.
The results: Does RF really work?
So, what were the results of this process for the patients
in the study? Did they achieve a "non-surgical facelift?
Was it worth the trouble? Were they satisfied with the improvement?
The physicians claimed they achieved "a measurable
lift effect" from the treatment. By carefully measuring
the height of the eyebrows from the level of the pupils before
treatment and again six months after treatment, they measured
an average "lift" of 0.5 mm. One-half of one millimeter
is the width of a line drawn by a medium ball-point pen!
That is insignificant improvement. In looking very carefully
at the before and after photos published with the study,
one cannot discern a noticeable "lift" effect.
Therefore, it is not surprising the patients tended to be
disappointed.
The physicians reported in their research that just half
of the patients (50%) were satisfied with the results. That
is not a very good result. We should expect a cosmetic procedure
to provide at least 90% of patients being highly satisfied.
Thermage RF disappoints far too many who have undergone a
risky and painful procedure.
The bottom line
This is the first controlled study published on the use
of RF energy for facial rejuvenation. It used the Thermage
ThermaCool device to deliver the treatments. The physicians
who performed the study are highly experienced cosmetic physicians.
Despite their tendency to state their results in a positive
light, we can conclude the following: Radiofrequency (RF)
treatments such as the Thermage ThermaCool do not provide
substantial improvements in facial skin laxity or wrinkles
when used in this manner. The treatments can be very painful
and are accompanied by an unacceptable degree of risk of
burning the skin including a 3.4% risk of scarring.
Other well established treatments such as Erbium laser skin
resurfacing provide far greater degrees of improvement in
wrinkles (typically 70% improved) and provide better skin
tightening (typically 10- 15% tightening) with a far better
safety record. Scarring is rare with laser skin resurfacing
of the face using the Erbium laser (much less than 1%). For
non-ablative treatments, FotoFacial intense pulsed light
treatments have been proven far more effective while preserving
an exceptional level of safety.
Perhaps the use of RF will be refined in the future and
have a place to contribute to our choices of cosmetic treatments.
For now, much better choices exist. Treatment regimens and
recommendations must always be individualized. Interested
persons should have a consultation with their cosmetic surgeon
and obtain all of the facts, including risks and limitations,
before deciding.
The study discussed was the "Multicenter Study of Noninvasive
Radiofrequency for Periorbital Tissue Tightening", by
Richard Fitzpatrick MD et al. published in Lasers in Medicine
and Surgery Nov. 2003.
The above information is presented for educational purposes
and not to recommend treatment for any individual or condition.
Dr. Paul Van Camp is a cosmetic laser surgeon and is medical
director of Aesthetics MD. Further information
is available at www.aesthetics-md.com or
by calling 330-6160.
|